Secondary research analyzes information that others have already collected and published. Also known as literature review, desk research, or documentary research, this approach synthesizes existing knowledge to establish what is currently known about a topic and identify areas needing further investigation.
Secondary research methods and applications:
- Literature reviews:
- Systematic examination of published research on a specific topic
- Synthesize findings across multiple studies to identify patterns and gaps
- Establish theoretical foundations for new research
- Can be narrative (descriptive) or systematic (following strict protocols)
- Examples: Academic literature reviews, state-of-the-art reports, bibliographic essays
- Database analysis:
- Statistical analysis of existing datasets for new research questions
- Access to large-scale data that would be impossible to collect individually
- Can examine trends over time or across populations
- Requires understanding of original data collection methods and limitations
- Examples: Census data analysis, longitudinal cohort studies, administrative records research
- Meta-analyses:
- Statistical combination of results from multiple independent studies
- Provides quantitative synthesis of research evidence
- Increases statistical power and generalizability
- Requires studies with similar methodologies and outcome measures
- Examples: Medical treatment effectiveness studies, educational intervention research
- Historical analysis:
- Examination of documents, records, and artifacts from past periods
- Reconstructs events, processes, and contexts over time
- Uses archival materials, government records, and contemporary accounts
- Requires careful evaluation of source credibility and bias
- Examples: Policy development studies, organizational histories, social movement research
- Content analysis:
- Systematic analysis of communication materials and media
- Can be quantitative (counting frequencies) or qualitative (identifying themes)
- Applicable to texts, images, videos, and social media
- Useful for understanding cultural trends and public discourse
- Examples: News media analysis, social media research, document analysis
- Comparative analysis:
- Systematic comparison across cases, countries, or time periods
- Uses existing data to identify similarities and differences
- Can test theories about causal relationships
- Requires careful attention to contextual factors
- Examples: Cross-national studies, best practices research, benchmarking studies
When to use secondary research:
- Substantial published research exists on your topic
- You need to establish what is already known before conducting primary research
- Time and budget constraints limit primary data collection
- You require historical or longitudinal data
- Your research question can be answered using existing information
- You want to identify trends across multiple studies or contexts
- You need to justify the need for primary research
Planning considerations for secondary research:
- Source quality assessment: Evaluate the credibility, methodology, and bias of original sources
- Search strategy: Develop systematic approaches for identifying relevant materials
- Inclusion criteria: Establish clear criteria for what sources to include or exclude
- Data extraction: Create systematic methods for recording and organizing information
- Currency requirements: Determine how recent sources need to be for your purposes
Advantages:
- Significantly faster and less expensive than primary research
- Access to large datasets and historical information spanning years or decades
- Can cover broader geographic or demographic scope than individual studies
- Builds comprehensive understanding of existing knowledge
- Excellent foundation for identifying research gaps and future directions
- Can reveal patterns and trends not apparent in individual studies
- Avoids duplication of existing research efforts
Challenges:
- Quality and reliability limited by the original research methods
- May not perfectly align with your specific research questions or variables
- Data may be outdated, incomplete, or collected using different definitions
- Limited control over methodology, sampling, and measurement approaches
- Potential publication bias toward positive or significant results
- Difficulty accessing proprietary or unpublished data
- Risk of over-relying on easily accessible sources
More Information: