Skip to Main Content

Research Methods

A comprehensive guide to research types or methods, covering fundamental distinctions between research approaches (primary vs. secondary, quantitative vs. qualitative, basic vs. applied) and provides guidance on selecting appropriate methodologies.

One of the most fundamental distinctions in research methodology concerns whether you're generating new data or analyzing existing information. This choice affects every aspect of your research design, from timeline and resources to the types of conclusions you can draw.

Primary Research

Primary research involves collecting original data directly from sources through methods you design and implement. As the researcher, you have complete control over what data is collected, how it is gathered, and when collection occurs.

Primary research methods and applications:

  • Surveys and questionnaires:
    • Structured instruments with standardized questions
    • Effective for collecting data from large populations
    • Can measure attitudes, behaviors, demographics, and opinions
    • Allow for statistical analysis and generalization
    • Examples: Student satisfaction surveys, market research questionnaires, health behavior assessments
  • Interviews:
    • One-on-one conversations using open-ended or structured questions
    • Provide detailed insights into personal experiences and perspectives
    • Allow for follow-up questions and clarification
    • Generate rich qualitative data for thematic analysis
    • Examples: Expert interviews, life history interviews, semi-structured interviews with stakeholders
  • Experiments:
    • Systematic manipulation of variables under controlled conditions
    • Establish cause-and-effect relationships
    • Include control groups and random assignment when possible
    • Measure specific outcomes and test hypotheses
    • Examples: Laboratory studies, field experiments, clinical trials
  • Observations:
    • Systematic recording of behaviors, interactions, or phenomena
    • Can be participant or non-participant observation
    • Useful for studying naturally occurring behaviors
    • Generate detailed descriptive or ethnographic data
    • Examples: Classroom observations, consumer behavior studies, wildlife research
  • Focus groups:
    • Facilitated discussions among 6-12 participants
    • Explore group dynamics and collective perspectives
    • Generate ideas and test concepts
    • Particularly useful for understanding social influences
    • Examples: Product testing sessions, policy feedback groups, community needs assessments

When to use primary research:

  • Existing data cannot answer your specific research question
  • You need current, up-to-date information
  • Your study requires precise control over variables and methodology
  • You want to test specific hypotheses or theories
  • Your research addresses a gap in existing knowledge
  • You need data from a specific population or context

Planning considerations for primary research:

  • Ethical approval: Many institutions require review of research involving human subjects
  • Sampling strategy: Determine how to select participants representative of your target population
  • Data collection timeline: Allow sufficient time for recruitment, data gathering, and analysis
  • Resource requirements: Budget for materials, incentives, transcription, and analysis software
  • Pilot testing: Test your instruments and procedures before full implementation

Advantages:

  • Data perfectly matches your research objectives and questions
  • You maintain control over data quality, timing, and methodology
  • Information is current and reflects present conditions
  • Can address very specific or novel research questions
  • Allows for innovative approaches and creative problem-solving

Challenges:

  • Requires significant time investment for planning, execution, and analysis
  • Can be expensive, especially for large-scale studies
  • May encounter ethical, legal, or institutional barriers
  • Requires expertise in research design and data collection techniques
  • Risk of low response rates or participant dropout
  • Need adequate sample sizes to ensure reliability and validity

Secondary Research

Secondary research analyzes information that others have already collected and published. Also known as literature review, desk research, or documentary research, this approach synthesizes existing knowledge to establish what is currently known about a topic and identify areas needing further investigation.

Secondary research methods and applications:

  • Literature reviews:
    • Systematic examination of published research on a specific topic
    • Synthesize findings across multiple studies to identify patterns and gaps
    • Establish theoretical foundations for new research
    • Can be narrative (descriptive) or systematic (following strict protocols)
    • Examples: Academic literature reviews, state-of-the-art reports, bibliographic essays
  • Database analysis:
    • Statistical analysis of existing datasets for new research questions
    • Access to large-scale data that would be impossible to collect individually
    • Can examine trends over time or across populations
    • Requires understanding of original data collection methods and limitations
    • Examples: Census data analysis, longitudinal cohort studies, administrative records research
  • Meta-analyses:
    • Statistical combination of results from multiple independent studies
    • Provides quantitative synthesis of research evidence
    • Increases statistical power and generalizability
    • Requires studies with similar methodologies and outcome measures
    • Examples: Medical treatment effectiveness studies, educational intervention research
  • Historical analysis:
    • Examination of documents, records, and artifacts from past periods
    • Reconstructs events, processes, and contexts over time
    • Uses archival materials, government records, and contemporary accounts
    • Requires careful evaluation of source credibility and bias
    • Examples: Policy development studies, organizational histories, social movement research
  • Content analysis:
    • Systematic analysis of communication materials and media
    • Can be quantitative (counting frequencies) or qualitative (identifying themes)
    • Applicable to texts, images, videos, and social media
    • Useful for understanding cultural trends and public discourse
    • Examples: News media analysis, social media research, document analysis
  • Comparative analysis:
    • Systematic comparison across cases, countries, or time periods
    • Uses existing data to identify similarities and differences
    • Can test theories about causal relationships
    • Requires careful attention to contextual factors
    • Examples: Cross-national studies, best practices research, benchmarking studies

When to use secondary research:

  • Substantial published research exists on your topic
  • You need to establish what is already known before conducting primary research
  • Time and budget constraints limit primary data collection
  • You require historical or longitudinal data
  • Your research question can be answered using existing information
  • You want to identify trends across multiple studies or contexts
  • You need to justify the need for primary research

Planning considerations for secondary research:

  • Source quality assessment: Evaluate the credibility, methodology, and bias of original sources
  • Search strategy: Develop systematic approaches for identifying relevant materials
  • Inclusion criteria: Establish clear criteria for what sources to include or exclude
  • Data extraction: Create systematic methods for recording and organizing information
  • Currency requirements: Determine how recent sources need to be for your purposes

Advantages:

  • Significantly faster and less expensive than primary research
  • Access to large datasets and historical information spanning years or decades
  • Can cover broader geographic or demographic scope than individual studies
  • Builds comprehensive understanding of existing knowledge
  • Excellent foundation for identifying research gaps and future directions
  • Can reveal patterns and trends not apparent in individual studies
  • Avoids duplication of existing research efforts

Challenges:

  • Quality and reliability limited by the original research methods
  • May not perfectly align with your specific research questions or variables
  • Data may be outdated, incomplete, or collected using different definitions
  • Limited control over methodology, sampling, and measurement approaches
  • Potential publication bias toward positive or significant results
  • Difficulty accessing proprietary or unpublished data
  • Risk of over-relying on easily accessible sources

More Information: